A musing Beam

This is the fifth installment of a series of posts on lessons we progressives should take on the election. The overview is here . As I mentioned in the original post, though there were many factors that led to the Democrats not retaining the White House in 2017, one major factor was losing the Rust Belt. The Democrats have not found a solution to the problem of union manufacturing jobs disappearing, and candidate Trump flipped the Republican script and went anti-free trade .   Somebody was listening to the working class, and it wasn’t the Democrats, and that was possibly the deciding factor.   Ignoring this constituency and trying to placate blue-collar factory workers with training grants was insulting, most importantly because it simply doesn’t work.   They believe that NAFTA and free trade let foreigners steal their jobs. Of course, the jobs didn’t go to Mexico or China, and it wasn’t free trade that created the problems. Protectionism might create a small uptick in manufa

This is the fourth installment of a series of posts on lessons we progressives should take. The overview is here .   NOTE:  I took a long hiatus for several personal reasons.  The entire series was already written a few months after the 2016 Presidential election, but I'm updating as needed as I post the ones as yet unpublished.  Surprisingly little has changed.   One of President Trump’s main slogans during the campaign was to “drain the swamp.”   The swamp was Washington, and draining it meant removing the corrupting influences, like lobbyists. We won’t be diving into why I think he has made no real attempt to actually fulfill that promise, but instead, let’s focus on why it resonated.   Congress has an abysmal popularity number.   As Arnold points out in this humorous (but slightly NSFW) video , cockroaches and herpes have higher poll numbers.   The President’s are better than that, but still more people dislike him than like him.   For this discussion, let’s define gerry

This is the third installment of a series of posts on lessons we progressives should take on the election. The overview is here . One of the most important functions of a democracy is to allow people who vehemently disagree to reach fair compromises that prevent non-legal solutions. This works when people believe that the process is fair and that, while their solutions didn’t win, at least they had the opportunity to make their case, and they can still win out if they can convince enough other people to join them. For many years, it was considered the role of the elected official to guard this process and preserve its prestige and strength.  There have, of course, always been those that wished to win out no matter the cost – the feud between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson has dozens of examples –, but they at least tried to appear otherwise. For most of our national history, bipartisanship has been viewed as a virtue. When there is a process that everyone thinks is fair, it has

This is the second installment of a series of posts on lessons we progressives should take on the election. The overview is here . One area that the message put forth by progressives is counter-productive is when intents are discussed instead of outcomes.  (Conservatives, of course, do this, too, but they are not my focus here.)  Let me go through some examples. The biggest example is using the term “racist.”  I don’t know that we’ve had an actual racist President in several decades, but every election that term is brought out. People said Mitt Romney was racist because of some "free stuff" comments after his NAACP address .   McCain was called a racist who reminded Rep. Lewis of George Wallace.  It happens virtually every election. The end result is that the term "racist" is so watered down that it has lost its meaning.  People are so jaded that, when the KKK announces its support for Trump and the KKK and the American Nazi party praises Trump's choice of

After my long list of blog posts leading up to the election, I’ve been trying to reassess.  I was pretty sure we had that one in the bag, and so that means I was out of touch. Others have been focusing on the many areas where progressives take issue with President Trump and his actions, and that is important – even vital – work.  But in this series, I’m not going to discuss Russia or North Korea, or executive actions, or SCOTUS, or cabinet members, or anything else like that.  Instead, I’m going to talk about where I think those with progressive values, like me, have missed the boat. First, let me assert my qualifications as a "liberal elite." I have a juris doctorate (so I'm over-educated). Especially for Arkansas, I make a pretty good paycheck. I drive a Civic Hybrid, and I still have a "Madame President for America" bumper sticker in the rear window.  I think that white privilege is still a real and systemic thing that should be addressed, I try to use the