Skip to main content

Small considerations

There's an old bit of advice that says you should look at how your date treats the server at the restaurant to see how nice a person your date is.  I think you should probably get to know your date a little bit better, and use a slightly more nuanced approach, but ... I think the point is very valid.  How you treat those that are situationally below you, hierarchically, says a lot about you.

My larger thought here, though, is about small considerations in general.  By small considerations, I mean when you have to think about something minor, and take a minor act, in consideration of someone else.  Put the shopping cart where it goes, park in between the lines, walk on the sidewalk instead of the grass, hold the door for someone, respond to a greeting, put an item back on the shelf where you got it, stay in the flow of traffic instead of trying to pull in front of someone half a mile down the line, etc. 

What does it take for you to feel empowered to ignore those small considerations?  For some people -- absolutely nothing.  They (quite literally) don't consider others, especially in small spots.  These people are absorbed in their own business and it simply does not occur to them that they should consider others.  Almost everyone, though, has tipping points.

So here's my mini-thesis:  The level of your considerateness should be gauged based on how long you hold out against this feeling of entitlement.

So, let's throw out some hypos. 
Do you feel that anytime you have your children that entitles you to ignore what others might want?  (You don't have to stand in line, you don't have to be nice to the person bagging your groceries, you don't have to acknowledge the handicapped parking space, etc.)
Do you feel like if you are late to a social gathering, you can be rude?
What about if you had a bad day?  Does that excuse you from social niceties?
What about if someone is rude to you?  Does that excuse you being rude?  Does it justify it (meaning not that it won't be held against you, but it is actually RIGHT to be rude)?
How about online?  Can you blast someone online even if you wouldn't in real life?
If you are fighting with someone, should you have to consider the rest of your audience?  Your kids, your spouse, your friends, your neighbors, random passersby?
If you want to hear the radio AND feel the wind on your face, should you think of the people in the houses you are passing by?
If it's nighttime, how quiet should you try to be?  Should you carefully close the doors?  Should you turn the handles so that the click of the door closing is inaudible?
Should you consider your neighbor's schedule when determining when to mow your lawn?
Should you always carry an extra Wal-Mart sack when you walk your dog ... just in case?

Now, there are at least 2 different types of being considerate, and what I am here discussing encompasses both. The first is whether the issue actually occurs to you -- if you CONSIDER the problem.  The second is whether you take action to help others, or not.

So, my feeling on this is that you should try to maximize the first type of consideration by being very aware of the effects of your actions on other people -- not just how it would effect YOU, but how your behavior effects others.  Once you are aware, you should then go through some sort of value balancing based on whether the difficulty/cost of action is worth the benefit gained.

Doing the first part is, in some ways, a lot harder; you have to learn to constantly walk in others' shoes.  And the crappy part about it is that, once you actually do that, you don't have the "Well, sorry, I really didn't think about it" excuse anymore, so you end up making more work for yourself.

But (as my theory goes) it's worth it.  You feel better about yourself, and others like you more.  It's another example of the Broken Windows theory (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fixing_Broken_Windows), which I buy, in general.

A few end-of-post thoughts:  1) I don't do the level 2 considerate thing in all of the above hypos, and I wasn't trying to say that everyone should; 2) Yes, I'm a middle child; 3) This blog led me to another topic, so I'll post something on it next.  :-)

http:\\amusingbeam.blogspot.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding facts and data about COVID-19

It's easy to find thoughts on COVID-19, but hard to parse through it all.  This series is my attempt to give my view of the state of knowledge about COVID-19, as of late July and early August  through late 2020. Here are the entries (these will become links as I post the others): Finding facts and data about COVID-19 (this one) Why COVID-19 is much worse than the seasonal flu Testing, contact tracing, and quarantining The path to vaccines To wear a mask or not Deaths and long-term impacts Economic and secondary impacts Safely co-existing Bots and divisiveness Leadership You need to find reputable sources for data.  People are rightly skeptical of what they see online.  In fact, the World Health Organization has declared that, beyond the pandemic, there is an Infodemic, which is “a surge of information about COVID-19 that has made it hard for people to know which news and guidance about the virus is accurate.” If you are actually interested in how to find the best new...

Why COVID-19 is MUCH worse than the seasonal flu

This is the second in a series of posts about the COVID-19 pandemic . This installment is discussing why COVID-19 is much, much worse than the seasonal flu. Here it is, in a nutshell : COVID-19 is more contagious, more deadly, already has more known long-term impacts, has no vaccine or truly effective treatments, and has no apparent seasonality. Contagion SARS-COV-2 is much more contagious. The median R0 (average number of people infected by each person when nobody is immune) is 5.7 , or more optimistically 2.5 . For the pandemic to go away, R0 would need to effectively be less than 1.  The estimate of the 1918 novel flu was between 1.2 and 2.4 .  (An R0 of 5.7 means we need over 80% of the population to be immune to reach effective herd immunity .) Beyond that, the incubation period is long, and the number of transmissions before symptoms begin hovers near half those infected . And the duration of being contagious is longer, up to 10 days after the first symptoms. That means ...

Apostrophes

A short rant -- why can't people correctly use apostrophes?   Heck, let's simplify: Why don't people use apostrophes AT ALL? I understand if you sometimes flub on "its" and "it's" .... It's a difficult distinction to make.   But the difference between "were" and "we're"?   They don't even sound the same! My guess is that this development is a confluence of a few forces: (1) Punctuation is not viewed to be important anymore, even by some teachers; (2) it takes an extra stroke to type an apostrophe on an iPhone (and several if you are using the old texting method); and (3) internationalization via the internet has made it more likely to see non-native speakers' work. Correctly using the language is not that difficult, and the rules are not really onerous. Though we shouldn't shoot for perfection, I think caring about how we communicate might increase online civility a touch ... and heaven knows it's nee...