Skip to main content

Your knowledge doesn't help me

The correct way to read that statement is to emphasize the second word:  I'm not interested in your knowledge; I'm interested in your actions.

This refrain was my frequent response to my daughters when, following when I would remind them about one of their responsibilities, they would answer something like, "I know that I have to do that."  Great, acknowledgement is the first step, but there are several more (not always 11 ... heh).  This boils down to the old saying that "Words are cheap" -- something I wish I had realized before I spent a few years getting a degree in English.  ( :-) ... but I still would have gotten it, 'cause I got to read all those cool books.)

A similar situation would arise when we would get onto one of the girls and she would say, sarcastically, "Well I'm sorry!"  I would calmly say, "No, you aren't."  In that case, she really was not.  Even if she was serious, though, I would usually push back.  "Don't say you are -- SHOW you are."  Like the writer's credo to "Show, don't tell" implies, good apologies are not qualitative statements but are instead quantitative acts.

An important corollary to this idea is that there are times when words -- even the "right" words -- are actually harmful.  They obscure the fact that what is needed is action in a classic (though probably unconscious) bait-and-switch -- I came in looking for a way to heal our relationship, and you gave me meaningless words.  Even when words would help, saying them too early, or at the wrong moment, can still be bad, especially if the sentence or the context devalues the statement with either an explicit or implicit " ... but," as in "I'm sorry, but ..." or "I love you, but ..." or "Thank you, but ...."

This post dovetails with an older one indicating my preference toward action.  It actually clarifies it a bit, and I'm trying to say that I don't consider words to be an "action," just like I don't consider words to be anything but the first step in an apology, a promise, a declaration of love, a giving of thanks, or virtually any other meaningful act that we have somehow come to associate with throwaway lines.  The statements may be necessary, but they are not sufficient.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding facts and data about COVID-19

It's easy to find thoughts on COVID-19, but hard to parse through it all.  This series is my attempt to give my view of the state of knowledge about COVID-19, as of late July and early August  through late 2020. Here are the entries (these will become links as I post the others): Finding facts and data about COVID-19 (this one) Why COVID-19 is much worse than the seasonal flu Testing, contact tracing, and quarantining The path to vaccines To wear a mask or not Deaths and long-term impacts Economic and secondary impacts Safely co-existing Bots and divisiveness Leadership You need to find reputable sources for data.  People are rightly skeptical of what they see online.  In fact, the World Health Organization has declared that, beyond the pandemic, there is an Infodemic, which is “a surge of information about COVID-19 that has made it hard for people to know which news and guidance about the virus is accurate.” If you are actually interested in how to find the best new...

Why COVID-19 is MUCH worse than the seasonal flu

This is the second in a series of posts about the COVID-19 pandemic . This installment is discussing why COVID-19 is much, much worse than the seasonal flu. Here it is, in a nutshell : COVID-19 is more contagious, more deadly, already has more known long-term impacts, has no vaccine or truly effective treatments, and has no apparent seasonality. Contagion SARS-COV-2 is much more contagious. The median R0 (average number of people infected by each person when nobody is immune) is 5.7 , or more optimistically 2.5 . For the pandemic to go away, R0 would need to effectively be less than 1.  The estimate of the 1918 novel flu was between 1.2 and 2.4 .  (An R0 of 5.7 means we need over 80% of the population to be immune to reach effective herd immunity .) Beyond that, the incubation period is long, and the number of transmissions before symptoms begin hovers near half those infected . And the duration of being contagious is longer, up to 10 days after the first symptoms. That means ...

The problem with fundamentalism, part 2: Religious fundamentalism

This is the second part of a two part series where I discuss the problems I see with two prevalent forms of fundamentalism (the first discussed Constitution and fundamentalism: http://amusingbeam.blogspot.com/2012/05/problem-with-fundamentalism-part-1.html ).  In this part, I will be discussing biblical fundamentalism.  I will be referring to sources more frequently here, as I cannot claim the expertise I could for the last installment. Let me start by saying that I understand this is an extremely controversial topic, especially the stance I am taking.  My goal is not to offend, but it is instead to discuss why I think a fundamentalist approach to the Bible (and, in some respects, any text) has insurmountable problems.  I think that most Fundamentalists I know are quite willing to discuss why they believe their hermeneutic approach is the correct one, so my hope is that they are equally sanguine when someone explains why that pathway seems problematic. Here is t...