Skip to main content

Election 2016: Trump flaw 1: Prejudice and courting the bigoted #NeverTrump


I’ll give Trump this: He never tried to hide his bigoted statements.  (For purposes of this post, I’ll keep bigotry to races, religions, and ethnicities, as the next post takes up insults as a whole.) He began his campaign saying that Mexico was sending illegal immigrants who are thieves and rapists, and some might be good people.  (To be fair, he didn’t limit it to Mexicans, but from “all over. South and Latin America.” I’m not sure how the Mexican government arranged all that.)  He said that an American-born judge couldn’t fairly decide his case because the judge’s parents are Mexican.   Both of these statements are bigoted, and there is no reasonable argument otherwise. (I would even go so far as to say that, if you don’t see the bigotry here, you may want to do some self reflection on your own tendencies. Here’s a helpful link to see your level of racism or other bigotries.)

He has also consistently been anti-Muslim, saying that he would bar Muslims entering the country, and even anyone from a Muslim country. He said that thousands of New Jersey Muslims celebrated on TV when they saw the towers fall on 9/11. He said he would put surveillance on mosques and shut some down if bad things happened.  He said he wouldn’t rule out creating a list of Muslims or having them carrying identification cards to note their faith   (No obvious historic parallel there….)

Black people have reason to fear his election. His “birther” attacks on President Obama certainly had many racist underpinnings.   He has retweeted racist propaganda with false statistics on crime. But he did say he was likely the least racist person on Earth, so … that made “the blacks”  feel better.   He doesn’t appear to understand the incredibly incendiary effect of using a possessive term (an ownership term) to describe black people: “Look at my African-American over here. Look at him. Are you the greatest?” 

The scary part about most of this, beyond the idea of following the first black President with a man spouting racist rhetoric, is that it seems like a concerted plan to cozy up to racists. I want to acknowledge that this is an extraordinary claim and that it breaks a rule I have about imputing motivations, so I’ll try to give a bit more evidence to this one.

Donald Trump has known who David Duke was from at least the beginning of the 21st century. When asked about him in an interview, he acted like he didn’t, though, and refused at first to disavow him.  The most troubling part of the interview was when Tapper said, “Ok, I’m just talking about David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan here,” and Trump still refused to disavow him.  He said he didn’t know anything about Duke, and that he couldn’t hear the question, but the day before he had disavowed Duke (so not knowing anything about him is a lie), and he said in the Tapper interview that he doesn’t “know David Duke,” so he heard the important part of the question. Maybe this was just a really troubling lapse caused by lack of sleep or something, but David Duke doesn’t think it was.  Duke noted that Trumps attacks on Muslims and illegal immigration have brought Duke’s (white supremacist) agenda into the mainstream; Duke says that he would be Trump’s biggest supporter.

There are troubling usages of Pepe the frog by Trump and his associates. Every time Trump and his surrogates uses rhetoric that hearkens to white supremacy and people google it, they have a decent chance of landing on a white supremacist website, and that has dramatically driven up web traffic to the big racists like Storm Front. A few times would be an inconvenient side effect, but the long-term continuation is troubling.  See a longer discussion of this here.

Underpinning much of his recent attack on the rigging of the systems is a very troubling echo of centuries of Antisemitism.  When you start talking about a secret group of “international bankers” that want to “plot the destruction” of a sovereign nation by meeting “in secret,” that should set off some warning flairs if you are familiar with history. And it did.  He has posted an image of Clinton over money that came from an anti-Semitic group, so this is by no means isolated to his “rigged election” junk. It was already a pattern even then.

I never thought that Romney was racist, and I thought Kanye’s outburst over W. Bush was silly. I think cries that most Republicans are racists are wrong (certainly wrong in the overt sense of the word). But Trump is either actively racist or is merely quite willing to court the vote of those who are racist. And this isn’t an innocuous racism, like sitting with people of the same race at a lunch table. This is the Klan, and Nazi rhetoric, that he is courting.

To me, this obviously makes him completely unacceptable as an American President, and it’s why -even the sub-standard 3rd-party candidates are better.

Even scarier is that this is not the only fatal flaw to his candidacy, and others (like his similar courting of the Russians) are at least as scary.  More on those in future posts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding facts and data about COVID-19

It's easy to find thoughts on COVID-19, but hard to parse through it all.  This series is my attempt to give my view of the state of knowledge about COVID-19, as of late July and early August  through late 2020. Here are the entries (these will become links as I post the others): Finding facts and data about COVID-19 (this one) Why COVID-19 is much worse than the seasonal flu Testing, contact tracing, and quarantining The path to vaccines To wear a mask or not Deaths and long-term impacts Economic and secondary impacts Safely co-existing Bots and divisiveness Leadership You need to find reputable sources for data.  People are rightly skeptical of what they see online.  In fact, the World Health Organization has declared that, beyond the pandemic, there is an Infodemic, which is “a surge of information about COVID-19 that has made it hard for people to know which news and guidance about the virus is accurate.” If you are actually interested in how to find the best new...

Why COVID-19 is MUCH worse than the seasonal flu

This is the second in a series of posts about the COVID-19 pandemic . This installment is discussing why COVID-19 is much, much worse than the seasonal flu. Here it is, in a nutshell : COVID-19 is more contagious, more deadly, already has more known long-term impacts, has no vaccine or truly effective treatments, and has no apparent seasonality. Contagion SARS-COV-2 is much more contagious. The median R0 (average number of people infected by each person when nobody is immune) is 5.7 , or more optimistically 2.5 . For the pandemic to go away, R0 would need to effectively be less than 1.  The estimate of the 1918 novel flu was between 1.2 and 2.4 .  (An R0 of 5.7 means we need over 80% of the population to be immune to reach effective herd immunity .) Beyond that, the incubation period is long, and the number of transmissions before symptoms begin hovers near half those infected . And the duration of being contagious is longer, up to 10 days after the first symptoms. That means ...

Apostrophes

A short rant -- why can't people correctly use apostrophes?   Heck, let's simplify: Why don't people use apostrophes AT ALL? I understand if you sometimes flub on "its" and "it's" .... It's a difficult distinction to make.   But the difference between "were" and "we're"?   They don't even sound the same! My guess is that this development is a confluence of a few forces: (1) Punctuation is not viewed to be important anymore, even by some teachers; (2) it takes an extra stroke to type an apostrophe on an iPhone (and several if you are using the old texting method); and (3) internationalization via the internet has made it more likely to see non-native speakers' work. Correctly using the language is not that difficult, and the rules are not really onerous. Though we shouldn't shoot for perfection, I think caring about how we communicate might increase online civility a touch ... and heaven knows it's nee...