Skip to main content

Al Qaeda is the KKK

Shortly after the events of 9/11/2001, there was an excellent episode of The West Wing ("Isaac and Ishmael") talking about the events and how to think about them.  It was written hastily, and discussing the events directly was pretty gutsy, that short after the event.

Josh Lyman, talking to high school juniors and seniors, makes an SAT-style question: "'Islamic extremist' is to 'Islamic' as [blank] is to 'Christianity.'"  There are a few guesses -- religious fundamentalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc.  Josh dismisses them (quite rightly), saying that, while the kids might disagree with what they do, those groups don't blow stuff up.  (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VatPKqTgzh4 .)

The correct answer is the Ku Klux Klan.  The Klan is a Christian terrorist group that has been operating since the middle of the 19th century (with a few decade hiatus at the turn of the 20th century).  It is widely known for killing people that disagree with it, often with religious symbols (such as burning crosses) used for hate.  If you are the wrong color, the wrong nationality, or of the wrong political persuasion, the Klan may well come after you.

Luckily, they do not hold the sway now that they did during Reconstruction.  (See how the clan is glorified in the classic movie, The Birth of a Nation.)  After two incarnations, they have been in decline for quite awhile, partly because of other Christians being outspoken against them ... and partly due to the old Superman show (really!).

Anyway, why is this important?  When we think of 9/11, or of attacks on our embassies, or other acts of terrorism, many people will talk about how these are "Muslim" attacks.  That is true in exactly the same way that lynchings in the South were the result of "Christian" attacks.  I think most Christians would say that the Klan does not represent Christianity -- I certainly hope so.  Extremist groups that claim the mantle of a religion do not define that religion.

The same is true of other religions.  If we think about it that way, we can target the groups that really do want to harm us, and try to avoid pissing off the rest of the world.  We can also stop trying to act patriotic by blaming religions and ethnic groups.  So, unless you would be okay with a history book describing the Reconstruction as when a group of Christians terrorized the South, please stop making the same mistake about Islam.

I guarantee you that we are safer as a country when we have more Islamic friends than enemies.  How do you think we were able to track down Saddam, and bin Laden, and the other terrorists?  Only good Christian intel?  Hardly.

As we remember the events that changed the world on September 11, 2001, and as we grieve for the victims in NYC, PA, and at the Pentagon, and their families and friends, let's keep focused on the best way to hold the right people accountable.  The victims deserve the best we can give them; our enemies deserve justice; and those that can join us in solidarity as our friends should not be pushed away through small-minded insensitivity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to read the Bill of Rights

The legal rights in the Bill of Rights didn't exist until the 20th century Social media has been abuzz with the Bill of Rights, and in particular the 1st Amendment, recently. Many posts, explicitly or implicitly, trace the Bill of Rights to the Founders.  That's wrong and leads to a poor understanding. A proper reading of the Constitution and the law reveals that, while the text was written then, these rights did not apply even on paper to the states until 1868, in fact until the middle of the 20th century, or even into the 21st century for the 2nd Amendment. “It is a Constitution we are expounding.” The Constitution sets out principles and goals, structures and limitations, and we must never forget that . It is law -- the highest law of the land , in fact -- but it is not code , which is detailed and often attempts to be exhaustively complete and explicit. The Constitution was written to provide a framework of balances by a group of  flawed aristocrats trying to rebel from ano

Election 2016: Why Hillary’s conflated scandals are unconvincing #ImWithHer

This is part of a series of posts on Election 2016 . To be honest, I’ve stopped listening to most of the scandals about Hillary. That’s not because I think she is perfect or would never do something scandalous, but because the noise of obvious crap, generated over 3 decades, has made me jaded about spending any time investigating stories by people who think Killary is a fascist Communist. To be clear, I think she is an imperfect human. We don’t subject most politicians to the kind of scrutiny that Hillary has faced – how much do we know about George and Laura’s relationship, or his struggles with addiction, for instance?  But she isn’t perfect.  I think she is a bit paranoid and has a tendency to “circle the wagons” at the slightest sign of problems, and I think she is a fierce competitor that swings first and asks questions later. Like all successful politicians, she is willing to spin the truth to meet her needs, and she comes across, in crowd settings, as a bit fake.  Unlik

Astrologists and racists, or this is where the party ends

How are astrologists like racists?  There could be a funny one-liner response to that, I'm sure, but the answer I'm looking for is simple:  They are lazy thinkers. I'm going to spend a few paragraphs here doing a cursory job of debunking both viewpoints and showing why they are lazy, but I'm not going to go into much detail, as that's not the real point I want to make. Astrology:  Really?  You honestly think that 1/12th of the human race will have the same general set of experiences based on when they were born?  (This is assuming the "normal" Zodiac, though a similar thing can be said about, for instance, the Chinese Zodiac, and this is ignoring the silliness added in by distinguishing between "Sun signs" and "moon signs.")  Do you realize that these signs were based on people believing some quite inaccurate things about the stars (like virtually anything besides that they are gaseous giants that are light years away)?  Did you kno